A myth of Aryan-Drividain Divide

There was no aryan-dravidian conflict as mentioned by max mulller and other colonial historian. It was revealed in A recent research conducted jointly by Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB) and scientiest from Havard University. ``This paper rewrites history... there is no north-south divide,'' Lalji Singh, former director of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB) and a co-author of the study said. British historian propagated this false story o justify thier occupation over India. They propagated that native peoples of India were Dravidian and Aryan came from outside. Aryan fought with dravidian and defeated them. So colonization started with aryans and we,British people did the same like Aryan did. They went further and to justify that any good thing can come only from Europe, said these aryans people came from Europe. Just on the basis of this fasle and stupid story, they were able to divide India between Northern Aryan and southern Dravidian. Specially in South India, few peoples helped to spread this philosphy specially periyar and currently Karunanidhi is helping to make this divide wider. After this research, truth has come that there is no aryan invasion and it was falsely imposed by colonial historian. Aryan is not a noun, its a adjective and used to refer nobel "Shrestha in hindi" men. The aryans and dravidian, both constitute a nation called Bharat. They both are credited t develop avedic culture which gave world a lession of peace. This was the vedic culture which taught the world to spread religion , not by force or by sword but by love. Indian cultue were spread till afganistan from north and to eastern asia from south. Thus there was a nation always since anicient time called Bharat.
The great Indian divide along north-south lines now stands blurred. A pathbreaking study by Harvard and indigenous researchers on ancestral Indian populations says there is a genetic relationship between all Indians and more importantly, the hitherto believed ``fact'' that Aryans and Dravidians signify the ancestry of north and south Indians might after all, be a myth. ``This paper rewrites history... there is no north-south divide,'' Lalji Singh, former director of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB) and a co-author of the study, said at a press conference here on Thursday. Senior CCMB scientist Kumarasamy Thangarajan said there was no truth to the Aryan-Dravidian theory as they came hundreds or thousands of years after the ancestral north and south Indians had settled in India. The study analysed 500,000 genetic markers across the genomes of 132 individuals from 25 diverse groups from 13 states. All the individuals were from six-language families and traditionally ``upper'' and ``lower'' castes and tribal groups. ``The genetics proves that castes grew directly out of tribe-like organizations during the formation of the Indian society,'' the study said. Thangarajan noted that it was impossible to distinguish between castes and tribes since their genetics proved they were not systematically different The study also helps understand why the incidence of genetic diseases among Indians is different from the rest of the world. Singh said that 70% of Indians were burdened with genetic disorders and the study could help answer why certain conditions restricted themselves to one population. For instance, breast cancer among Parsi women, motor neuron diseases among residents of Tirupati and Chittoor, or sickle cell anaemia among certain tribes in central India and the North-East can now be understood better, said researchers. However, researchers said there was no scientific proof of whether Indians went to Europe first or the other way round.